IMBeR West Pacific Symposium - participant feedback

I am

I am a student an early career researcher a researcher employed by a charity employed by a private business session moderator/convenor on the IMBeR SSC Other, please specify Other, please specify
This is the first West Pacific Symposium (formerly China-Japan-Korea (CJK) IMBeR Symposium) I have attended

This is the first West Pacific Symposium (formerly China-Japan-Korea (CJK) IMBeR Symposium) I have attended Yes No
I attended

I attended Session 1: Coastal Blue Carbon: Measurements, Modeling, and Assessment Session 2: Strengthening Coral Reef Resilience to Climate Change and Human Impacts Session 3: Dried Small Fish: Ecology, Value Chains and Nutrition Session 4: Ecosystem-Social Interactions in the Coastal Sea Session 5: Towards the Sustainable Indo-Pacific Region (IPR): Marine Biogeochemistry and Biodiversity Session 6: Marine Extreme Events: Impacts, Forecasting, and Risk Management Session 7: Connectivity of the West Pacific and Southern Ocean: the Importance of Oceanic Top Predators Session 8: Ecosystem, Biogeochemistry, and Interventions in the Western Pacific and its Marginal Seas: Beyond the Disciplinary Borders
I was (1 not satisfied to 10 very satisfied) with the quality of the sessions
Must be a number between 1 and 10
I was (1 not satisfied to 10 very satisfied) with the number of the sessions
Must be a number between 1 and 10
There was (1 not enough to 10 plenty) of time for discussion
Must be a number between 1 and 10
There was (1 not enough to 10 plenty) of time available to network
Must be a number between 1 and 10
Did you learn actionable information that will help you in your work activities? (1 not enough to 10 plenty)
Must be a number between 1 and 10
If applicable, please provide examples of this information and how it will help you
Did you make new connections that you will likely follow up for research purposes in the future? (1 no new connections to 10 lots of new connections)
Must be a number between 1 and 10
Did you make new connections that you will likely follow up for career development outside of academia in the future? (1 no new connections to 10 lots of new connections)
Must be a number between 1 and 10
Did you become aware of new research that you were previously unaware of? (1 nothing new to 10 aware of lota of new research)
Must be a number between 1 and 10
How likely are you to take part in follow up activities from the Symposium (e.g., training sessions, IMBeR Young Scholar, special issues, etc.)? (1 very unlikely to 10 highly likely)
Must be a number between 1 and 10
Did the discussions and presentations make you feel more hopeful about solving the challenges covered in the session you attended? (1 less hopeful to 5 no change to 10 more hopeful)
Must be a number between 1 and 10
How likely are you to attend another West Pacific Symposium? (1 very unlikely to 10 highly likely)
Must be a number between 1 and 10
Given your experience, would you encourage others to attend future IMBeR West Pacific Symposium?

Given your experience, would you encourage others to attend future IMBeR West Pacific Symposium? Yes No
How likely are you to attend another IMBeR conference (e.g., Open Science Conference (Future Oceans) or Workshops (IMBIZO))? (1 very unlikely to 10 highly likely)
Must be a number between 1 and 10
Given your experience, would you encourage others to attend future IMBeR conferences (e.g., Future Oceans, IMBIZOs, etc.)?

Given your experience, would you encourage others to attend future IMBeR conferences (e.g., Future Oceans, IMBIZOs, etc.)? Yes No
If you could change one thing about West Pacific Symposium to improve it, what would that be?
What topics would you like to see covered at future West Pacific Symposium or other IMBeR conferences?
What other metrics would you use to measure the sucess of West Pacific Symposium and have these been met on a scale of 1-10?
Any other comments you would like to feedback to the organisers?